We have seen many student-athletes misguided by signing a School’s standard NIL deal and have had to help unwind several now— signing the Standard NIL deal is not always in the athlete’s best interest. You get recruited by a coach, their scheme, and their play style. That’s what maximizes draft potential and growth as a player. But a coach’s timeline (nowadays) is rarely the same as the athletes. So what happens when the coach leaves and a new coach comes in who did not recruit you or will not showcase you in the same way?
Schools are suing players which means players need to plan ahead for these scenarios. Scrutinize the early-termination and buyout language with the same care a coach’s multi-year contract receives—because the timelines rarely track.
Coaches routinely negotiate mobility, notice periods, and reciprocal buyouts; players deals often go for one year from their signing date and contain one-sided termination clauses. Recent enforcement actions show schools will sue to collect when athletes transfer soon after re-signing, and “industry standard” NIL contracts frequently just means terms written by the side with more leverage.
Read more here.
We can help, call Erramilli Law Group
📞 (650) 503-9314
🌐 www.ErramilliLawGroup.com